The global conversation around high-profile billionaire divorces has resurfaced—this time with an Indian technology leader at its centre. Zoho founder and CEO Sridhar Vembu is embroiled in what is being described as the costliest divorce involving an Indian businessman and one of the four most expensive divorces in the world. A California court has directed Vembu to post a $1.7 billion bond, roughly translating to ₹15,000 crore, amid ongoing divorce proceedings with his wife of nearly three decades, Pramila Srinivasan.

Though the court order was passed earlier, details of the case entered the public domain only recently, triggering widespread global attention. The sheer scale of the financial stake stands in stark contrast to Vembu’s carefully cultivated public image—one of frugality, rural development, and distance from Silicon Valley excess.

A Marriage That Spanned Three Decades

Sridhar Vembu married Pramila Srinivasan in 1993, at a time when both were establishing their professional careers in the United States. Vembu had arrived in the US to pursue a PhD in electrical engineering from Princeton University, while Srinivasan, born and raised in New York, went on to earn a PhD in electrical and computer engineering from Purdue University.

The couple settled in California, where they lived for nearly 30 years and raised a son, now 26, who has been diagnosed with autism. During these years, Zoho—originally founded as AdventNet in 1996 by Vembu, his brothers, and friend Tony Thomas—grew into a global software powerhouse. The company was rebranded as Zoho Corporation in 2009 and today employs over 12,000 people, serving more than 80 million users worldwide.

Sridhar Vembu’s Net Worth and Zoho’s Ownership Structure

According to Forbes, Sridhar Vembu’s net worth was estimated at $5.85 billion in 2024, placing him 39th among India’s richest individuals. However, court filings reveal that Vembu personally holds only about 5% of Zoho’s shares, with the majority owned by his siblings.

Zoho remains a privately held company, and its complex ownership structure has become a central point of contention in the divorce case—particularly in light of California’s community property laws, which mandate equal division of assets acquired during marriage, regardless of where those assets are located globally.

The Move to India and the Beginning of the Dispute

In 2019, Sridhar Vembu made a dramatic life change, relocating from Silicon Valley to his native village of Mathalamparai in Tamil Nadu. He has since been overseeing Zoho’s operations largely from India while spearheading ambitious rural development initiatives, including employment generation in tier-2 and tier-3 towns.

According to sources close to Srinivasan, Vembu informed her via WhatsApp in November 2020 that he wanted a divorce, and formal divorce papers were filed in August 2021. Srinivasan subsequently filed for divorce in 2020, alleging abandonment and financial misconduct.

Explosive Allegations in Court Filings

At the heart of the legal battle are serious allegations made by Pramila Srinivasan. She claims that Vembu abandoned her and their son, who has special needs, and never returned to the United States after moving to India. She has also alleged that she supported the family during the early years of Zoho’s growth.

More critically, Srinivasan has accused Vembu of secretly transferring Zoho’s most valuable assets, including intellectual property and shareholdings, to family members in India through complex transactions—without her knowledge or consent. She contends that these transfers were designed to reduce her legal entitlement under California’s community property regime.

In a 2023 court filing, she stated:

“My husband of 29 years not only abandoned me and our son, he decided to make fictitious transfers or ‘sales’ of our most valuable community asset to his family members without their paying any cash or other consideration, and without ever telling me or asking my permission.”

Among the transactions flagged by Srinivasan’s legal team is the $50 million sale of Zoho’s intellectual property to an India-based entity, ZPCL, for which there is allegedly no clear record of payment. Vembu, however, maintains that the funds from the sale remain with the original US holding company, T&V Holdings.

Vembu’s Rebuttal and Public Response

Sridhar Vembu has categorically denied all allegations of wrongdoing. In a detailed post on X (formerly Twitter) in 2023, he rejected claims that he abandoned his wife or son or deprived them financially.

“It is complete fiction to say I financially abandoned Pramila and my son,” Vembu wrote. “They enjoy a far richer life than I do, and I have supported them fully. My US salary for the last three years has been with her, and I gave our house to her. Her foundation also is supported by Zoho.”

Vembu has also stated that he requested Srinivasan and their son to join him in India, but that the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted those plans. He insists that his move was driven solely by a desire to pursue rural development and decentralised employment, not to evade legal obligations.

The $1.7 Billion Bond and Legal Developments

The California court’s decision to order a $1.7 billion divorce bond followed an ex parte application moved by Srinivasan in November 2024. The order, issued in January 2025, was intended to safeguard potential marital assets amid ongoing litigation.

However, Vembu’s lawyer, Christopher C. Melcher, has clarified that the order is currently under appeal and described Srinivasan’s claims as “outrageously false.” The legal battle has taken several twists and remains unresolved.

Who Is Pramila Srinivasan?

Pramila Srinivasan is an academician, entrepreneur, and healthcare technology expert based in the San Francisco Bay Area, where she currently lives with her son. In 2007, she founded MedicalMine, a company focused on electronic health records and practice management solutions.

She is also the founder of The Brain Foundation, a non-profit organisation dedicated to autism research, treatment, and community outreach. According to the foundation’s website, Srinivasan oversees its daily operations and is deeply involved in its mission to support individuals with developmental and mental health disorders.

The foundation states that its work is driven by her commitment to advancing medical research that could lead to FDA-approved therapies for conditions associated with autism and other developmental disorders.

Where the Divorce Ranks Globally

The staggering scale of the Vembu-Srinivasan divorce places it among the world’s most expensive marital splits. At the top of the list remains the Bill and Melinda Gates divorce, in which Melinda Gates reportedly received assets worth $73 billion following their separation in 2021 after 27 years of marriage.

Second is the 2019 divorce of Jeff Bezos and MacKenzie Scott, with Scott receiving approximately $38 billion, later becoming one of the world’s most influential philanthropists.

The third costliest divorce involved Alec and Jocelyn Wildenstein, which ended in 1999 after 21 years of marriage, with a settlement close to $3.8 billion.

Other notable cases include Rupert Murdoch’s divorce from Maria Torv, estimated at $1.7 billion, and Steve Wynn’s separation from Elaine Wynn, involving close to $1 billion.

A Case That Blends Wealth, Law, and Personal Tragedy

Beyond the staggering numbers, the Sridhar Vembu divorce case underscores the complex intersection of global wealth, family dynamics, cross-border corporate structures, and community property law. It also highlights the personal toll behind public success stories—particularly when issues of caregiving, disability, and trust are involved.

As legal proceedings continue, the outcome is likely to have significant implications not just for the individuals involved, but also for how Indian-founded global companies navigate ownership, governance, and marital law across jurisdictions. For now, Sridhar Vembu’s ₹15,000-crore divorce stands as a stark reminder that even the most carefully constructed public personas can unravel under the weight of deeply personal disputes.

With inputs from agencies

Image Source: Multiple agencies

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Vygr Media.