In a disappointing turn of events for Indian sports, wrestler Vinesh Phogat's appeal for a shared silver medal at the Paris Olympics 2024 was rejected by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) on Wednesday, August 14. This decision upholds the International Olympic Committee's (IOC) earlier ruling, leaving India without its potential 7th medal at the Games. The case has sparked discussions about the stringent weight regulations in wrestling and their impact on athletes.
The Controversial Disqualification
Vinesh Phogat's Olympic journey came to an abrupt end when she was disqualified from her women's 50kg gold medal match after failing the weigh-in on the second day of the competition. Despite clearing the initial weigh-in and securing three victories, including a stunning upset over Japanese wrestler Yui Susaki, Phogat was found to be 100 grams overweight on the day of the final. This minor weight discrepancy led to her disqualification and a last-place finish in her category.
The Indian wrestler's team argued that the weight gain was due to the body's natural recovery process and not a deliberate attempt to gain an advantage. They contended that it was an athlete's fundamental right to look after their body and that the weight gain only occurred because of recovery, not fraud.
Legal Battle and CAS Decision
Following her disqualification, Phogat and her team launched a legal battle to overturn the decision. The case was brought before the Court of Arbitration for Sport, known for its strict application of sports regulations. The CAS hearing, presided over by Sole Arbitrator Dr. Annabelle Bennett, lasted three hours on August 9, with both parties presenting their arguments.
The Indian Olympic Association (IOA) enlisted senior counsels Harish Salve and Vidushpat Singhania to represent Phogat. Despite multiple deadline extensions and the submission of additional evidence, the CAS ultimately decided to uphold the IOC's original decision, denying Phogat's request for a shared silver medal.
Reactions and Calls for Reform
The CAS verdict has elicited strong reactions from the Indian sports community. IOA president PT Usha expressed shock and disappointment, stating that the case highlights the need for more equitable and reasonable standards that prioritize athletes' well-being, particularly for female athletes.
_1723657335.webp)
The incident has also sparked a broader debate about the fairness of two-day weigh-ins at the Olympic Games. American wrestling great Jordan Burroughs has called for United World Wrestling to reconsider its rules, suggesting a 1kg weight allowance for the second-day weigh-in and advocating for both semi-finalists to receive Olympic medals instead of the current repechage format.
Vinesh Phogat's case has brought to light the challenges faced by athletes in meeting strict weight regulations and the potential consequences of minor infractions. While the CAS decision marks the end of Phogat's quest for an Olympic medal in Paris, it has ignited important conversations about athlete welfare and the need for more flexible and humane regulations in wrestling and other weight-class sports. As the dust settles on this controversy, the sports community will be watching closely to see if any reforms are implemented to address these concerns in future competitions.
Inputs by Agencies
Image Sources: Multiple Agencies
Ⓒ Copyright 2024. All Rights Reserved Powered by Vygr Media.
