Every time an Indian achiever makes global headlines, social media lights up with pride. Cricket victories, Oscar wins, startup unicorns—each becomes a marker of India’s growing influence. But behind these flashy symbols lies another, quieter force shaping the nation’s future: science. And if the latest “Top 2% Scientists in the World” list from Stanford University is any indication, India has a lot to cheer about. Over 6,000 Indian-origin scientists and researchers have made the cut this year, and the list is peppered with names from some of India’s most reputed institutions such as the Indian Institute of Technology (IITs) and the Indian Institute of Science (IISc).

This achievement isn’t just about numbers. It is a reflection of India’s expanding knowledge capital, an area often overshadowed by conversations about its economy or politics. When we say 6,000 Indians are among the best in the world at what they do, it means the country is producing people whose work stands shoulder to shoulder with the world’s finest. For a nation aspiring to become a global powerhouse, this quiet force of science can prove to be its strongest muscle.

What Is the Stanford List and Why Does It Matter?

Before moving further, let us understand what this much-celebrated list is all about. Compiled by Stanford University researchers, the “Top 2% Scientists in the World” list identifies scientists across disciplines based on their impact on research. This impact is measured by a range of criteria, including citations, research papers, and influence in shaping their area of study.

In simpler terms, this isn’t a celebrity popularity contest; it’s about serious work with real-world implications. Citations reflect how often other researchers refer to a scientist’s work. If you are popular in academic literature, it means your research is not only respected but also forms the foundation for future discoveries. Being among the world’s top 2% is, therefore, like being part of an Olympian team of knowledge creators.

For India to have thousands of names on this list shows that, despite challenges, the country’s intellectual backbone remains strong.

The IITs and IISc: Pillars of Indian Science

It comes as no surprise that IITs and IISc dominate the Indian entries. These institutions began with a vision to build leaders in science and technology, and decades later, they continue to justify that vision.

The IITs were created in post-Independence India when the country was desperate to achieve technological self-reliance. Today, their alumni populate NASA, Google, leading pharmaceutical companies, and cutting-edge research centres. Some IIT graduates, of course, end up building careers abroad, but increasingly, many are staying back in India to push boundaries of research at home.

Then there’s IISc Bengaluru—the crown jewel of Indian science, set up in 1909 with the philanthropy of Jamshetji Tata and support from the British government. It isn’t just India’s oldest research institution in science and engineering but also one of its finest, producing world-class research consistently. Seeing IISc scientists figure prominently on the Stanford list is almost expected, yet equally celebratory.

The fact that these institutions stand tall even when benchmarked against global standards is proof that India’s model of nurturing excellence in select “temples of learning” has paid dividends.

The Brain Drain Question

But here comes the uncomfortable truth. While many of the 6,000 Indians on the list are affiliated with Indian universities and labs, a lot of them are based abroad. The “brain drain” problem has never really gone away; it only got rebranded as “brain circulation” in recent years. Many Indian-origin scientists gain their foundational training in India but then make their mark while working with top labs in the US, Europe, or even Singapore.

This raises an important question: Why can’t more of this excellence flourish within India’s borders?

The answer lies in long-standing gaps. Funding for research in India has historically lagged behind global standards. Our percentage of GDP spent on R&D—hovering around 0.6%—is far below countries like the US, China, or Germany. Bureaucratic hurdles add another layer of frustration, with researchers often spending more time chasing approvals than chasing ideas.

Still, these challenges make the presence of Indian names in such a global ranking even more impressive. It shows resilience—a trait that Indian scientists seem to master.

What It Says About India’s Talent Pool

The inclusion of thousands of Indians on the Stanford list is not just about celebrating names. It reveals something deeper: that India has the raw intellectual talent to solve some of humanity’s biggest challenges. Whether it is climate change, health crises, or artificial intelligence risks, Indian-origin researchers are everywhere, leading conversations and designing solutions.

In the past decade, Indian researchers have been among key contributors in vaccine development, clean energy, and space science. The Chandrayaan-3 landing near the moon’s South Pole earlier this year made waves worldwide, but such landmark events often overshadow the quiet, everyday grind of Indian scientists working in labs, writing code, or testing theories. This Stanford recognition gives them a collective spotlight.

The Global Stage: Indians as Knowledge Exporters

There is also a global angle to consider. For decades, India has been the world’s back office for technology—with its software industry powering banks, airlines, and governments across continents. But with science, India isn’t just exporting services; it’s exporting knowledge. And knowledge doesn’t shrink by sharing—it multiplies.

Every Indian scientist building a breakthrough abroad carries with them a slice of India’s intellectual potential. From Harvard to Heidelberg, from Silicon Valley to Singapore, Indian academicians are shaping curricula, editing journals, and defining research agendas. This global presence is India’s soft power at work—less obvious than Bollywood or cricket, but far more enduring.

What Needs to Change

Celebrating the victory is important, but stopping there would be foolish. The lesson to take from this achievement is clear: India must invest far more in science and research.

• Funding: At 0.6% of GDP, India’s research funding is abysmally low compared to the US (2.7%) or China (2.4%). Without increasing this, dreams of becoming a science superpower will remain just that—dreams.

• Infrastructure: Cutting-edge labs, modern libraries, and funding for innovation are essential. Many Indian universities outside the IITs and IISc struggle with outdated equipment and bureaucratic funding delays.

• Freedom to Think: Science thrives where there is freedom to question, debate, and disagree. Any climate of censorship hurts not just democracy but also innovation.

• Industry-Academia Link: In the US, companies fund university research heavily. In India, this connection remains weak. Encouraging industries—especially pharma, space, renewable energy, and AI—to partner with universities can be game-changing.

A Cultural Shift in How India Sees Science

Finally, there is the cultural aspect. As a society, do we really celebrate scientists the same way we celebrate actors or athletes? We still have a long way to go. Children are still told to “become doctors or engineers” but rarely encouraged to “become researchers.” Our TV debates obsess over politics, but rarely invite scientists to discuss climate change or AI threats.

The Stanford list gives us a chance to reframe this narrative. Imagine if the faces of these 6,000 scientists were as instantly recognizable as a cricketer’s. Imagine schools holding quiz sessions on Indian research achievements instead of just freedom fighters. That is the cultural leap India needs—making science not just respectable but aspirational.

A Moment of Pride, A Call to Action

The presence of over 6,000 Indians among the world’s top 2% scientists is a proud moment, but it should not remain just a headline. It is proof of what India can achieve when talent meets opportunity. It is also a reminder of how much untapped potential lies in its classrooms, labs, and lecture halls, waiting for better support.

Globally, the 21st century is being called the “century of knowledge.” For India to claim leadership in this century, it must go beyond celebrating names on international lists. It must invest in creating millions more such achievers. Because every scientist we empower is not just an individual triumph—it is a national investment in the future.

The Stanford list should, therefore, be read less as a compliment and more as a challenge. A reminder of what India is capable of—and what India still owes its scientific community.

With inputs from agencies

Image Source: Multiple agencies

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Vygr Media.