Google loses antitrust lawsuit over Play Store practices, showcasing the victory of the epic side.
In a conclusive ruling, a federal jury favoured Epic, the company responsible for the widely-played video game Fortnite, in its legal dispute against Google. The trial, which took place in San Francisco, centred on claims that Google impeded competition in the Android app market to secure significant profits from its Play Store.
The main concern revolved around whether Google hindered competition for its Play Store and payment services on Android devices. According to Epic, Google made an astounding $12 billion in operating profit solely from its Play Store in 2021, due to what Epic perceived as excessively high fees. Epic aimed to introduce an alternative billing system on the Play Store as a means to bypass Google's fees.
Google's CEO, Sundar Pichai, respectfully defended the company's actions during the trial. However, the jury's decision now places the responsibility on the judge to determine the appropriate remedies that Google must face. Google's Vice President, Wilson White, expressed the company's intention to appeal, emphasizing the inclusiveness and various options provided by Android and Google Play.
In a blog post, Epic emphasized the importance of legislation and regulation to effectively address the dominant positions held by Google and Apple in the smartphone app ecosystem. Tim Sweeney, the CEO of Epic Games, celebrated the verdict as a significant milestone in the application of US antitrust law in the tech industry. Specifically, he raised concerns about the widespread implementation of a 30% commission fee in the gaming sector.
Sweeney suggested that the ruling highlights the antitrust concerns linked to the standard commission rate in the gaming industry. He believes that the 30% fee may not be sustainable for much longer, indicating possible changes in the industry's landscape.
This legal battle is similar to Epic's previous case against Apple in 2021, in which Apple effectively defended its rules that limit the use of rival stores and payment methods on its devices. However, it is important to note that there are differences in Google's situation as it lacks direct control over the hardware that utilizes its operating system and instead relies on licensing agreements with multiple manufacturers.
PC: Forbes India
Epic contended that Google had entered into agreements with device manufacturers, network operators, and game developers to sustain its dominance. The company asserted that these agreements enabled Google to direct digital purchases through its Play Store, resulting in the imposition of a substantial commission fee.
The outcome of this case further contributes to the increasing examination of tech giants, as the Department of Justice's antitrust division has filed a separate lawsuit against Google. The allegations involve potentially unlawful agreements to establish Google's search as the default option on devices and browsers, and closing arguments are set to take place in May 2024.
In conclusion, Epic's victory raises questions about the practices of the tech industry, suggesting possible future shifts and an increase in regulatory oversight.
Ⓒ Copyright 2023. All Rights Reserved Powered by Vygr Media.
